AACE-PSP Exam Questions & Answers
Planning & Scheduling Professional (PSP) Exam • AACE International
100% money-back guarantee
Sample AACE-PSP Questions
Practice with real exam-style questions, each with the verified correct answer and explanation.
As the project plan is developed a mechanism is developed to communicate the projects organic structures that will facilitate reporting against the baseline schedule and cost estimate or budget Which of the following is NOT used for reporting?
An earned value-based project control system can use either of which two budgets as the basis of its calculations?
An earned value management (EVM) system can base its calculations on labor hours or monetary values, depending on the nature of the project. Both methods are valid for tracking performance and forecasting outcomes.
Option B (direct or indirect cost) does not align with EVM's focus on performance metrics.
Option C confuses timeframes with budgeting principles.
Option D (linear feet or dollars) applies to physical progress tracking but not directly to EVM systems.
This is consistent with EVM principles as outlined in project control methodologies within the PSP materials.
How could the structural steel drawing delay have been prevented?
Preventing Structural Steel Delays:
Incorporating realistic timeframes for shop drawing review and resubmittals in the baseline schedule prevents design-related delays.
Evaluation of Other Options:
A: Adding time buffers does not address the root cause.
C: Concurrent review may create confusion and errors.
D: Switching to post-tensioned concrete is a significant design change, not a practical solution for a scheduling issue.
Verification with PSP Guidelines: Adequate review time aligns with PSP scheduling best practices (Ref: PSP Study Guide, Chapter 2B: Schedule Development and Baseline Creation).
Schedules are periodically updated to reflect progress. What step should NOT occur before the update is considered complete?
Based on the stated costs, what percentage of the total cost comes from the 2000 series of activities?
Cost for 2000 Series Activities:
Activity 2001: $150,000.
Activity 2002: $25,000.
Activity 2003: $18,000.
Activity 2004: $96,000.
Total: 150,000+25,000+18,000+96,000=289,000150,000 + 25,000 + 18,000 + 96,000 = 289,000150,000+25,000+18,000+96,000=289,000.
Total Project Cost:
Total cost: $7,308,000 (sum of all activities in 'normal' schedule).
Percentage Contribution:
289,0007,308,0001003.95%\frac{289,000}{7,308,000} \times 100 \approx 3.95\%7,308,000289,0001003.95%.
Verification with PSP Guidelines: The PSP Study Guide emphasizes accuracy in percentage-based cost contributions as a critical analysis tool in project cost management (Ref: PSP Study Guide, Chapter 1B: Cost Breakdown Structure).
Get access to all 216 verified questions with detailed answers.
Unlock All AACE-PSP Questions